TWP is part of PSU’s General Education program and represents the first course in which students will learn about and have opportunities to practice the goals of the program. These goals, which we call Habits of Mind, are purposeful communication, problem-solving, integrated perspective, and self-regulated learning.
When we communicate purposefully, we are aware of the historical and cultural context in which the communication is taking place (awareness of context), we are able to comprehend messages that others are communicating to us (comprehension), we are able to provide evidence and strong arguments in our message that are appropriate to our audience (purposeful expression), and we think about what we are trying to achieve through our communication and use communication strategies that will help us achieve those goals (effective application of strategies).
If we are effective problem solvers, we can determine the various parts of the problem (problem-framing), we understand the challenges we might encounter in trying to solve the problem (challenge identification), we develop a plan for solving the problem (plan development), we decide how to proceed with the solution and revise our plan if new information indicates that we should do so (decision-making and revision), and we are able to evaluate our progress in solving the problem (evaluation).
Effective integration of perspectives means that we understand that our perspective of a situation is not the only perspective but arises out of our personal experiences in the world (self-awareness), that we seek out perspectives that differ from our own (perspective-seeking), that we understand that our personal decisions have an impact on the world beyond ourselves (interconnectedness), and that we can effectively collaborate with others (collaboration).
Finally, if we are self-regulated learners, we take responsibility for our own learning and understand that, in order to learn, we must commit to and be engaged with own learning (engagement in the learning process), and we understand how we learn best and seek ways to provide those experiences for ourselves (meta-cognition).
These Habits of Mind are ways of engaging with the world that employers say are important to them when evaluating potential employees. For example, a 2021 survey by the National Association of Colleges and Employers (NACE) indicates that more than two thirds of employers look for the following skills when evaluating the resumes of college graduates: ability to work in a team, problem-solving skills, analytical/quantitative skills, communication skills (both written and verbal), initiative, leadership, and technical skills. Only analytical/quantitative and technical skills are not mentioned (or strongly implied) in our descriptions of the Habits of Mind but both are explicitly part of our General Education program. Study after study shows that the kinds of “soft skills” are among the most important things that employers look for when hiring new employees.
As I said earlier, TWP is a course where we can guarantee that every student will have the opportunity to practice and develop the Habits of Mind. This means we need to design learning experiences in TWP for students to have the opportunity for this practice and development. There are lots of ways to design such experiences so we have looked at the kind of work faculty were already doing in their classes at PSU and have developed the Integrated Cluster Learning model as a framework for designing those experiences. The Integrated Cluster Learning model focuses on three strands of educational practice: interdisciplinarity, project-based learning, and open education. In TWP, we combine all three of these strands to design the learning experiences that provide students with the opportunity to practice the Habits of Mind.
I wrote previously about each of the three strands of the Cluster Learning Model:
When a student chooses to major in a particular field, they are choosing to learn a particular set of ways of viewing and engaging with the world. Each student will learn about the methods used in their chosen field. They will learn about what counts as evidence or knowledge in their chosen field (which is called epistemology) as well as the historical development of these methodological and epistemological choices. These items comprise the discipline of their chosen field. The ways that an English major engages with the world is quite different than the ways that a Physics major engages with the world. This is an example of disciplinarity. Plymouth State University students have a strong disciplinary grounding through the courses in their major. The Cluster Learning Model focuses interdisciplinarity. We bring students together in interdisciplinary teams (students from different majors) and help them to integrate their particular disciplinary expertise with that of other students. Students learn to talk and collaborate with other students whose backgrounds and education cause them to view and engage with the world differently.
We believe that deep learning comes from action. Therefore, we provide students with the opportunity to work on projects that will make a difference in the world. This project-based learning allows students to practice all of the Habits of Mind as they take increasing responsibility for designing and implementing group projects that will make a difference in the world.
And we understand that our students come to us with full lives outside of the classroom. We are committed to using open educational practices (which is called open pedagogy) to take those lives into account. Open pedagogy means that we try to break down various barriers that are features of traditional educational experiences. For example, we break down the economic barrier to access to educational materials by using Open Educational Resources (OER) which are free to students. We understand that students come to us with pre-existing knowledge and that they can do more than simply consume knowledge created by others. They can contribute knowledge that benefits the world and so we engage them in writing OER and creating web sites and designing and developing projects with and for off-campus partners. We want our students to have the opportunity to practice their self-regulated learning skills and so we break down the traditional conception of who has control in the classroom. We provide our students with opportunities to determine what they will learn about a particular topic, how they will learn it, and how they will demonstrate their learning. Open pedagogical practices allow us to truly put students at the center of the classroom.
In the same blog post, I wrote a bit about TWP:
In their first year at PSU, students are required to take Tackling a Wicked Problem (TWP). Each section of the course is focused on a cultural or societal problem (a wicked problem) that is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to solve because there are so many perspectives on the cause of the problem, because implementing solutions would be expensive and likely have unforeseen negative consequences, and because the problem is intimately connected to other wicked problems. Examples of wicked problems from previous sections of TWP include homelessness, poverty, racism, climate change, disinformation, gender inequality, pollinator decline, hunger, and so on.
Although each section of TWP is focused on a different wicked problem, they all have the same goal: to give students the opportunity to practice the Habits of Mind. There is a common assignment in which students learn about the Habits of Mind and reflect on their development of them before they entered the class, identifying their strengths and areas that they might need to work on. At least twice during the semester, they reflect on their continued development of the Habits of Mind as they engage in the activities of the class and they do a final reflection at the end of the semester. The activities are focused on students designing projects that will address some aspect of the wicked problem:
In the class, students are guided by a faculty member to design and develop projects that might have some lasting impact on some part of the problem. Students will not solve the problem but are trying to make a some sort of difference in the world. They might organize a food drive to combat hunger in their local community. They might design a micro-windmill to provide alternative energy sources in the fight against climate change. They might build a claim checking web site to combat disinformation. They might plan a campus garden that is friendly and attractive to bees and other pollinators. They might organized a petition in support of a low-income housing project to try to combat homelessness in the local community. The students come up with the ideas. They design the projects. They implement the project plans. They think about their current development of the Habits of Mind and set goals for themselves in reflective essays. And through their self-reflective work on their self-designed projects, they work on their communication and problem-solving skills, they collaborate with each other and people outside the classroom, and they begin to develop a sense of agency necessary for becoming self-regulated, life-long learners.
One of the challenging things about teaching TWP is that the instructor can’t completely plan the course ahead of time because students will be working on projects that they have designed. In order to complete the projects, students might need to learn things that the instructor didn’t anticipate. For example, when I was teaching a section on climate change, a group of students got very interested in micro-wind and decided to build a prototype of a small, personal windmill. In order to build the windmill, they needed to learn how to read electronics schematics and how to solder. I would never have anticipated that a group of students might need to learn how to solder in a class focused on climate change. If I didn’t know how to solder, my job as an instructor would be to help students figure out how to learn that particular skill.
In other words, a big part of TWP is to help students learn how to learn. This is also sometimes challenging for students because they are often used to someone telling them what they need to memorize, reproducing that knowledge on an exam, and then moving on to the next content they need to memorize. When we insist that they figure out what they need to learn in order to accomplish the task they are trying to accomplish, students can sometimes feel like we aren’t actually teaching them. Instructors have to work hard to get students to understand that the main goals of TWP are bigger than learning about the wicked problem itself. We have to constantly remind them (and ourselves) that the Habits of Mind are the most important part of the class.
Because TWP is such a unique course (and because we are concerned about access to instructional materials), we have developed an Open Educational Resource (OER) for TWP. Besides containing information about wicked problems and the Habits of Mind, a large portion of the OER is devoted to information literacy skills. In order to be self-regulated learners who know how to learn new things, students must be able to effectively evaluate the validity and credibility of information in today’s information landscape. So the OER contains traditional information literacy content about things like using the library databases, what peer-review is, etc. In addition, the OER contains information about tools such as the SIFT method for evaluation claims made on social media platforms and random web sites. Students don’t typically write traditional research papers in TWP because the course is focused on taking action in the world but all of the projects should include some sort of research about topics such as populations most affected by the wicked problem, what others are already doing about the wicked problem, how the wicked problem is related to other wicked problems, what resources related to the wicked problem are available in a particular area, and so on.
TWP is the foundational course in PSU’s Cluster Initiative. It is a challenging but really fun class to teach. Students who participate in the Cluster Pedagogy Learning Community have asked where else they can get the kinds of learning experiences that they had in TWP because they like feeling as though their work in school is making a difference in the world. I hope more faculty become involved in using the Cluster Learning Model, both by teaching TWP and by incorporating some of the ideas of the model in their other classes.
